Sunday, April 20, 2008

Health and beauty; conformity?




There have been many issues lately addressing the 'thin' phenomena that has seeped its way into the media all over the world. According to the weekend Today paper, 'France outlaws online thinness' ;a Bill has been passed in France by the National Assembly citing a up to three year jail term is pendable for anyone who tries to 'encourage' anorexia and extremely thin bodies on websites, magazines and even in advertisements. This bill was passed after the French government came across pro-anorexia and bulimia websites on the net from US encouraging girls to purge and even giving tips on how to lose weight unhealthily such as through laxatives and other drugs. Though this can be viewed as an extremely drastic measure, I feel its a step forward in helping crack down on this unhealthy thin trend that has caused so many deaths and misery in young men and women of today. Also, I'd like to see it as a small step forward in helping change ideals of beauty and promoting different shapes and sizes in the future.







The media is one of the main influences in encouraging this unhealthy trend by subtely stating that only 'thin is beautiful' and showing endless advertisements and fashion spreads featuring only stick thin models; this message we are sending the public is contaminating individuality, and telling the public that there is only one beauty when beauty is subjective and opinions are different from person to person. When I was younger I remember models like Cindy Crawford who had voluptous figures being the 'ideal' beauties of the time, and back then did alot of people not say these figures were beautiful? Not to say they were correct in their opinion but this an example of how far the fashion industry has fallen; as well as how trends have changed, and not for the better. Infact, when have they ever been ideal? Healthy or not who gave the media the right to dictate what is beautiful and 'healthy' and what isn't? Health for one is dependent on the indiviual's personal well-being not on their body shape or any of their outward appearances. I for one would like to one day see magazines and advertisements feauturing men and women of all shapes and sizes; and heights, a variety where people can relate to more rather than conforming to just one 'ideal' that some mass-marketing medium tells us is right and that everyone should look like that in order to be 'beautiful'. No matter what some one looks like it should be about personal beauty more than any thing else, not abusing your body in order to fit what some one else tells you is right. Even models who go to lengths such as ankle implants, skin-bleaching, UV tanning and breast implants to fit the requirements of lingerie companies, Playboy or sports magazines, this is still trying to fit into some thing else, and not through healthy means either. Even with the more Maxim-based models, implants, hormone use and excessive surgery is abusing the body to fit some one else's standards, though one can argue at the end of the day it is their choice. But for impressionable younger men and women out there who were not born with the figures fashion industries covet, there are only so many means what can take to achieve these 'ideals' and how often are these means healthy in the long run? Even in terms of clothes and make-up, some like to wear it heavy, some don't, some prefer to look flashier, some prefer the natural look; its what they feel is beautiful and confident in. One has to remember they can't please everyone (no matter how much of the majority you please), as not everyone agrees with the same things. Isn't satisfying yourself important at the end of the day?Yes choice is choice, but let it be their choices, the fashion editors the media moguls, the models, let that be their ideals, and not let them try to influence and suck in those who don't believe in their extremes.

Monday, April 14, 2008

Has bullying reached a whole new level?

Everyone knows what bullying is, for example; the taunts kids yelled at school, extortion, fights, spreading rumours; an extremely horrifying and sad problem that many students face in high school. Now with the use of technology as well as physical violence, bullying has escalated to an even more dangerous and threatening level. Some may have heard recently of another case of internet bullying that has occured in the United States, Lakeland, Florida;

http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=42578&cat=14

Victoria Lindsay was unknowingly trapped in a classmate's house (where she had run away from home to) and under went severe beatings, threats, name-calling and humiliation by 6 of her classmates and 2 older teenage boys; all of this was being taped by one of the perpetrators, a 16 year old fellow cheerleader from her high school, their intention? To humiliate Victoria by posting this video on the net for public viewing; Why did they decide to commit such a horrifying act? For alleged 'trash talking' Victoria had done about these girls over the internet; in particular the popular site Myspace.com.

Here there are so many aspects to question; the by-stander effect, the 2 older boys present had no problems with Victoria, but chose to stand by idley and allow this battery to happen to a young girl while they had the power to intervene and stop this assault before it got even worse. Are people become more and more malicious today and formulating new ways of torture, both mental and physical at such a young age? Is myspace to blame as it was an outlet for this 'trash talking' to happen? If this behaviour had occured in school itself, would the situation have been dealt with the same way?

I feel that if Victoria had indeed spread rumours and talked about her friends behind their back at school, a confrontation in school or some where out of school would have occured except on a less malicious level; there would have been no abduction, no filming, no plans for humiliation. The bullies found this evidence of 'trash talking' on the internet, which added more fuel to the fire each time they viewed Victoria's page and kept it in thus they slowly planned what to do, getting angrier and angrier as the 'trash talking' carried on, making their final decision to address this issue so malicious and so violent that they lost sight of how trivial the whole situation actually was. Vengeance and bullying has risen to an all new level, with popular sites like Myspace not having censorship and screening for such videos (myspace only censors gore, nudity, anti-religion propaganda etc) before they are posted, this case of internet bullying and having the victims humiliated with videos online is not the first time. Even Youtube, where any video can be posted regardless of it's content, where even the more graphic videos can be viewed with merely making an over-18 account. Have our youth become so tainted and affected by what goes on on the internet rather than in real life? Globalisation may just have caused people to create the idea to humiliate globally.

Saturday, April 5, 2008

The search for rationale; does society determine what individuals feel is right and wrong?

This is an article I came across a few months ago about the horrific shooting of a 15-year old boy in Oxnard, California by a fellow 14-year old student in his school.








The reason behind this murder? The deceased Lawrence King, was gay and had asked his murderer to be his Valentine. Was this a hate crime? Did the shooter, Brandon McInerney, find this gesture of affection so deeply disturbing and Lawrence's sexual orientation so abnormal that he had to resort to murder? Did Brandon have a deeper psychological problem? Masen Davis, the executive director of the Transgender Law Center stated that Brandon "is just as much a victim as Lawrence, as he’s a victim of homophobia and hate.” Was Mr Davis pointing out the fact of how much external factors had influenced Brandon to think in this hateful, homophobic manner?

This of course is not the first time such violence has occured in schools; the Thurston High School massacres in 1998, the Columbine High School shootings in 1999 and the Virginia Tech Massacre in recent 2007. The public and the media have searched and searched for the reasons behind, what could've possibly driven these young men to commit such crimes? Of course there are many reasons the media has claimed to have found for us; that it must have been the violent video games and movies the shooters were so fond of, it must have been the anti-depressents some of them were taking, it must have been their ties with the 'alternative' subcultures and music which must have so heavily influenced them, because they had no guidance from their family and God, because they were outcasts at school, because they were bullied and had no one there to listen to them; who can really say what the exact reason was? Could it have been aspects of all of them? Could it have been none? Would all these 'reasons' slowly surface in explanation of Brandon McInerney act of murder like they did in past school massacres? Can one really pin-point some ones motives and influences for their actions? Wouldn't it be like trying to read minds?

Here's an extreme example; on the exact day of the Columbine Massacre, April 20th 1999, the US dropped the largest number of NATO missiles on a village in lower central Serbia, NOT Kosovo which is located in southern Serbia where the war was going on. His explanation? The US wanted to “intimidate the Serbians but minimize harm to innocent people.” Were the hospital, the primary school and the aspirin factory bombed not full of innocent people? The US had also stated on Febuary 17th of that same year 1999 that the United States would commit about 4,000 personnel to 'implement peace' in Kosovo-with their goal being to "stop the fighting now, rather than later." With this warfare going on all around the world, for years and years now, how come no one has ever said hmm, maybe the President had an influence on this violent behavior, after all, people would be viewing this violence and destruction of the ongoing war on the news, in the papers, on the radio would they not? The public were of course told he was doing the 'right thing'; in this case of war and the security of civillians in the US and Serbia, this violence was 'necessary'. Do people believe things are right because they're told yes this is the truth free of all biasedness, or because their judgement really is a conclusion of their own thoughts? Which comes to the question: how much does society play into your own opinions and judgements? Case in point, how much do your peers, the media, society and social norms really affect your personal opinions? Does it happen subconsiously? Would you have a different opinion if certain factors were not present?

In the case of Brandon McInerney, for examples; did mere homophobic jokes on television or around him subtlely tell this young boy that homosexuality was some thing to laugh about? Did every day insults used by alot of youth today such as 'fag', 'thats so gay' and 'homo' on others implement to him to be labelled this things was actually a horrible insult? Did organisations or religions tell him that homosexuality was blasphemous and an act against God? Did he overhear people around him discussing how 'wrong' homosexuality is? Despite every sector, be it the media, the church, the human rights groups having their own opinions, and that is of course everyones right, is it really fair to have them implement their ideals on others, let alone youth? Telling them what is right and what is so wrong that they must take action? What is right and what is wrong? Isn't it different with every individual you meet? Either way shouldn't your opinions and actions be free of any harm to others? Shouldn't people should figure things such as these out for themselves in their own time, and determine what is right according to their own opinions, as free as they can be of what external factors tell them.

Maybe society should look all around on what influences people, and it may not always be the most obvious reasons: popular culture cause its so much more accessible than political factors, the scapegoats, the ones who disagree with the 'norms', the pin-ups for violence and hate, or the underdogs that are the ones to blame.




"All we are saying is give peace a chance" ~ John Lennon